In all cases, authors are expected to abide by the Nature Research press and embargo policies. The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information such as conflicts of interest and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. For more information, please see our Nu-flow Rice Concentrate, is still under consideration, NPGManuscript under editorial consideration, Geometric Distribution Expected Value Proof, manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods. who will be interested in the new results and why. Our writing experts guarantee your manuscript will be 100% worthy of acceptance. Answer: Status descriptions vary across journals. We will acknowledge receipt of your submitted manuscript by email. If Nature's editors agree to reconsider a paper, the other original referee(s) will have the chance to see and comment on the report of the referee who is the subject of the complaint. Invitation to Editors & Call for Manuscripts Nature methods how long does it take to publish a PNAS paper (direct submission)? For questions about submissions currently under editorial consideration please contact the journal Editorial Office at [emailprotected] For production enquiries please contact the journal Production Editor Allan Venida.. For general enquiries, please look at our support information.. For any other queries, contact the Open Research Support team. Manuscripts should be submitted with the understanding that they have neither been published, nor are under consideration for publication elsewhere, in the same form or substantially similar form. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. They mentioned that the cafeteria staff receive training on hygiene occasionally but have never received training on healthy eating and healthy cooking. Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. Science is a weekly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes significant original scientific research, plus reviews as well as commentary on current research, science policy, and issues of interest to the broad scientific community. ISSN 0028-0836 (print), report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere). But future readers of your manuscript will certainly appreciate a good story. Hopefully, the exact situation will. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. They havent decided yet. We received approval from the institutional review board of Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, under Nepal Health Research Council (Reference number: 70/16) for the human subject contacts and obtained written informed consent from the participants before collecting data for research purpose. It's a good idea for you to . We look forward to your comments and remain with best regards; Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx, PONE-D-21-05456R1Stakeholder engagement in a hypertension and diabetes prevention research program Description and Lessons learnedPLOS ONE. On the Encyclopedia platform, the entry type "Topic Review " has a Definition part that usually starts with "Title is". The peer review file is published online as a supplementary peer review file. The status changed to "Manuscript under editorial consideration" last night without it changing to "Editor decision started" like in other examples. What could this mean? ISSN 1548-7091 (print), Corrections, Retractions and Matters Arising, Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and protocols. quality, format, scientific novelty, language etc). ]]> Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2659/, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK214555/, http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols, https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf, http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/349, http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions, http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long, http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. Lines 379 to 387: It would be useful if the authors could highlight on how they incorporated the views of the stakeholders in each step, probably in a Table format. the second sentence means that you have passed this initial check and that your ms has (or will be) sent to the reviewers. To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. Alternatively, they may be considering that you submit to another journal within Nature, where there may be a better match. The journal has confirmed that you've uploaded and submitted the correct documents and that the content of your paper is relevant . Probably no answer to thisbut posting this will make me feel a little better? Occasionally papers go through multiple revisions over the course of a year or more, though we try to avoid more than two rounds of peer review. The manuscript below has entered the review process. //--> As part of the Nature Portfolio, Nature Methods has common policies that our authors and prospective authors must follow. Direct transfer to Nature Communications was proposed. Thank you for visiting nature.com. (Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received). Information for authors. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. I submitted to Nature Neuroscience about 9 days ago and it's been "under consideration" for about a week. The editor reads (yes, we read every paper that is submitted, and not just the abstract! Few days ago, I submitted a manuscript to a journal through their online submission system. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? The following types of contribution to. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. Have they appropriately validated the methods performance? Obviously time will reveal all but I would appreciate any sort of insight. [CDATA[// >